| |
I don’t live anywhere. I used to live somewhere, but I moved and where I live
now isn’t anyplace, at least not a place with a
name. It’s just a house in
Lakewood, on a street, with a
number. That’s all.
The condominium where I used to live (in Rocky River, since you asked) is one of a group known collectively as Golden Oaks, although I can’t tell you
why. There are no oaks, golden or otherwise, anywhere on the
grounds. Just a few small crab apples near
the balcony and a couple of locust trees in the
back.
Not far from Golden Oaks is a smaller group of condos called Riverbank
Estates. They’re nice enough, I suppose, although I think calling them estates is stretching things a little, and they’re at least three miles from the nearest
river. As for banks, well, the closest ones are at the mall, and those are only branch offices.
One of my friends used to live in a place called the Courtyard, which, near as I can remember, didn’t have a
courtyard. In fact, I don’t think it had any yard at all, but that’s one of the things many people like about living in a condominium or an
apartment. No yard, no yard work. Still, it doesn’t go very far toward explaining the name.
There probably hasn’t been a quail in Quail Hollow since the first bulldozer lumbered
in. Ditto for the wildlife at Whitetail Run, Fawn Lake, and the
Sandpiper. I won’t venture such a statement about Big Turtle Apartments, “big” being a relative term and therefore, like a wet turtle, a little slippery, but I’d bet the farm that neither Eagle’s Pond nor Pheasant’s Walk sports the species it’s named
for. And let’s not even discuss Bear
Creek. I mean, bears in Cleveland?
Chicago, maybe, but not Cleveland.
As for the Woodhawk development - an upscale community on the other side of town that includes apartments, town houses, cluster homes, and detached dwellings - it’s named for a nonexistent
raptor. Roger Tory Peterson’s A Field Guide to Birds East of the Rockies (a good book – ask any birder) lists no such
hawk. Neither does The Birder’s Handbook or Golden
Press’ Birds of North America (a decent guide but not, in my opinion, on a par with
Peterson.) You’d think with all the money they poured into that place they could afford to name it for a real bird.
There may be a kernel of truth in the names of Walnut Hill (just one hill) and Hickory Hills (more than one hill) but if Chestnut Lake has any chestnuts, you can bet they’re
imported. Orchard Hill (also only one hill) and MacIntosh Farms may have apple trees but I feel certain there’s no citrus anywhere in Orange Tree Estates except in the residents’
refrigerators. Orange trees are less likely in northeast Ohio than bears.
One of the few real estate entities that has any sense to its name is the Riverbend
Condominiums. This one is downtown in the Flats, and it’s right on the Cuyahoga River which, by the way, means “crooked river.”
(But you knew that.) Purchase one of those units and if you forget where you live you know where to look for your
house. You just have to remember which bend in the crooked
river. In most cases, though, this kind of logic will get you into
trouble.
Churchill Downs sounds as if it should be in Kentucky, but it’s right here in
northeast Ohio. North Church Towers ought to be in Boston, but it’s here,
too. So are Nantucket Cove, which ought to be off the coast of mainland Massachusetts, and Walden, which also belongs in
Massachusetts. As for the Alamo Apartments, they’re only about 15 miles south of my
place. Even my grasp of geography is better than
that.
It gets
sillier. The nearby Village in the Park is neither a village
or a park. It’s a building with a road on one side and a parking lot on the
other. And the Islander isn’t in the East Indies or the South
Seas. It’s an apartment complex in a southwest suburb surrounded on all sides by
pavement. And the Westlake is in Rocky
River.
Of course, more truthful names might not do much for occupancy or
sales.
Interstate Estates and Concrete Hill lack the cachet of more bucolic
monikers. Suburban Towers and Fast Food Ridge, for all their accuracy, wouldn’t have much appeal, although I kind of like the idea of Mallview.
(On a clear day, you can see a parking space...)
If where I live were a development instead of just a block of homes, it might be called Railview, since my home is near the tracks (on the right side, of
course). Shortstop Hollow is another possibility, since the ball field is just beyond the train
tracks. Or Big Squirrel Homes. That has a nice ring to it and would be very appropriate, given the neighborhood’s healthy population of bushytailed rodents, fed fat on the acorns of Lakewood’s many nongolden
oaks.
My favorite
though, is something like “Village in the City” or “City in the Town,” because it doesn’t really tell you a
thing. Just like street names and house
numbers. They convey no atmosphere, conjure up no particular
ambiance. They don’t tell anything at all about where you
live. Except, of course, exactly where it is.
From
You
May Already Be a Winner and Other Marginal
Considerations
The Kent State University Press
|
|